All Issue

2019 Vol.35, Issue 6

Research Article

Evaluation Methods of Cyclic Shear Stress Ratio for the Assessment of Liquefaction in Korea

국내 액상화 평가를 위한 진동전단응력비 산정

Byeong-Soo Yoo1
,
Tae-Ho Bong2
,
Sung-Ryul Kim3*
유 병수1
,
봉 태호2
,
김 성렬3*
1Member, Ph.D. Student, Dept. of Civil & Environmental Eng., Seoul National Univ.
2Member, Research Assistant Prof., Institute of Construction & Environmental Eng., Seoul National Univ.)
3Member, Associate Prof., Dept. of Civil & Environmental Eng., Seoul National Univ.
1정회원, 서울대학교 건설환경공학부 박사과정
2정회원, 서울대학교 건설환경종합연구소 연구조교수
3정회원, 서울대학교 건설환경공학부 부교수
* Corresponding Author
30 June 2019. pp. 5-15
PDF XML Citation
Abstract

액상화 평가를 수행할 때 진동전단응력비(CSR)는 일반적으로 지반응답해석 또는 Seed & Idriss의 간편법을 수정한 방법을 통해 산정하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 진동전단응력비 산정방법의 적용성을 분석하기 위하여 1차원 등가선형 지반응답해석을 수행한 후 미연방도로국(FHWA), 일본도로협회(JRA), 국내설계기준(KDS) 등에서 제안한 방법을 적용하여 진동전단응력비를 산정하였다. 연구결과, 국내설계기준(KDS)으로 산정한 진동전단응력비가 해석 결과와 가장 큰 오차를 나타내었다. 그 이유는 국내설계기준의 경우 깊이에 따른 응력감소계수를 최대진동전단응력의 비가 아닌 최대지반가속도의 비로 정의하는 오류가 있기 때문이다.

Usually, the cyclic shear stress ratio (CSR) for the assessment of liquefaction has been determined by performing ground response analysis or adopting simplified method suggested by Seed & Idriss with some modifications. In order to analyze the applicability of the CSR evaluation methods, the present study performed one-dimensional equivalent linear analysis and evaluated CSR based on design codes from FHWA, JRA, and KDS. The comparison of the CSR obtained from each code showed that the CSR from KDS showed the largest error with the analysis results. The reason is because KDS has an error, which defines the stress reduction coefficient applying the maximum acceleration at each depth, not the maximum cyclic shear stress mobilized in the soil.

Keywords
Cyclic shear stress ratio (CSR)
Ground response analysis
Stress reduction coefficient

References
1
Cetin, K. O. and Seed, R. B. (2004), "Nonlinear Shear Mass Participation Factor (rd) for Cyclic Shear Stress Ratio Evaluation", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.24, No.2, pp.103-113.
10.1016/j.soildyn.2003.10.008
2
Dobry, R., Ladd, R. S., Yokel, F. Y., Chung, R. M., and Powell, D. (1982), Prediction of pore water pressure buildup and liquefaction of sands during earthquakes by the cyclic strain method (Vol. 138). Gaithersburg, MD: National Bureau of Standards.
3
Marsh, M. L., Buckle, I. G., and Kavazanjian, E. (2014), LRFD seismic analysis and design of bridges (reference manual). FHWA NHI-15-004.
4
Farrokhzad, F. and Janalizadeh, A. (2017), "Depth Reduction Factor Assessment for Evaluation of Cyclic Stress Ratio Based on Site Response Analysis", Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol.54, No.4, pp.244-252.
10.1007/s11204-017-9465-1
5
Golesorkhi, R. (1989), Factors influencing the computational determination of earthquake-induced shear stresses in sandy soils, University of California, Berkeley.
6
Ishihara, K. (1977), "Simple Method of Analysis for Liquefaction of Sand Deposits During Earthquakes", Soils and Foundations, Vol.17, No.3, pp.1-17.
10.3208/sandf1972.17.3_1
7
Ishihara, K. (1985), "Stability of Natural Deposits during Earthquakes", Proc. of 11th ICSMFE, 1985, 1, pp.321-376.
8
Imai, T., Tonouchi, K., and Kanemori, T. (1981), The simple evaluation method of shear stress generated by earthquakes in soil ground, Rep, 3, pp.39-58.
9
Iwasaki, T., Arakawa, T., and Tokida, K. I. (1984), "Simplified Procedures for Assessing Soil Liquefaction during Earthquakes", International Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.3, No.1, pp.49-58.
10.1016/0261-7277(84)90027-5
10
Iwasaki, T. (1986), "Soil Liquefaction Studies in Japan: State-of- the-art", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol.5, No.1, pp.2-68.
10.1016/0267-7261(86)90024-2
11
JRA (2012), 5 Seismic Design Guide specifications for highway bridges, the commentary, Japan road association, Japan.
12
MLIT (2018), general Seismic design (KDS 17 10 00), Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, Korea.
13
MOF (2018), Harbour and Fishery design criteria･design code (KDS 64 17 00), Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea.
14
Kim, S. I., Park, I. J., and Choi, J. S. (2000), "A Study on the Assesment of Liquefaction Potential in Korea", Journal of The Korean Society of Civil Engineers, Vol.20, No.2C, pp.129-129.
15
Kramer, S. L. (1996), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA.
16
Kishida, T., Boulanger, R. W., Abrahamson, N. A., Driller, M. W., and Wehling, T. M. (2009), Seismic response of levees in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta, Earthquake spectra, Vol.25, No.3, pp.557-582.
17
Maurer, B. W., Green, R. A., Cubrinovski, M., and Bradley, B. A. (2014), "Evaluation of the Liquefaction Potential Index for Assessing Liquefaction Hazard in Christchurch, New Zealand", Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol.140, No.7, 04014032.
10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001117
18
Nemat-Nasser, S. and Shokooh, A. (1979), "A Unified Approach to Densification and Liquefaction of Cohesionless Sand in Cyclic Shearing", Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol.16, No.4, pp.659-678.
10.1139/t79-076
19
ProShake User's Manual (1996), Ground Response Analysis Program, Version 2.0. EduPro Civil systems, Inc. Sammamish, Washington.
20
Russell, J. and van Ballegooy, S. (2015), Canterbury Earthquake Sequence: Increased Liquefaction Vulnerability Assessment Methodology, Tonkin & Taylor Ltd, New Zealand.
21
Rashidian, V. and Gillins, D. T. (2018), Modification of the liquefaction potential index to consider the topography in Christchurch, New Zealand. Engineering Geology, 232, pp.68-81.
10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.11.010
22
Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M. (1970), Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analysis, Rep. No. EERC 70-10. Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, Berkeley, CA.
23
Seed, H. B. and Idriss, I. M. (1971), Simplified procedure for evaluating soil liquefaction potential, Journal of Soil Mechanics & Foundations Div.
24
T&T (2013), Liquefaction vulnerability study, Tonkin & Taylor Ltd, New Zealand.
25
Vucetic, M. and Dobry, R. (1991), "Effect of Soil Plasticity on Cyclic Response", Journal of geotechnical engineering, Vol.117, No.1, pp.89-107.
10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:1(89)
26
Youd, T. L. and Idriss, I. M. (2001), "Liquefaction Resistance of Soils: Summary Report from the 1996 NCEER and 1998 NCEER/NSF Workshops on Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils", Journal of geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, Vol.127, No.4, pp.297-313.
10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2001)127:4(297)
27
Yoshida, N. (2015), Seismic Ground Response Analysis, Springer, Berlin, Germany.
28
Zhang, G., Robertson, P. K., and Brachman, R. W. (2002), "Estimating Liquefaction-induced Ground Settlements from CPT for Level Ground", Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol.39, No.5, pp.1168-1180.
10.1139/t02-047
Information
  • Publisher :The Korean Geotechnical Society
  • Publisher(Ko) :한국지반공학회
  • Journal Title :Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
  • Journal Title(Ko) :한국지반공학회 논문집
  • Volume : 35
  • No :6
  • Pages :5-15
  • Received Date : 2019-03-27
  • Revised Date : 2019-05-07
  • Accepted Date : 2019-05-08
  • DOI :https://doi.org/10.7843/kgs.2019.35.6.5
Journal Informaiton Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society
Archives
: Vol.23~28 (2007~2012)
  • NRF
  • KOFST
  • KISTI Current Status
  • KISTI Cited-by
  • crosscheck
  • orcid
  • open access
  • ccl
Journal Informaiton Journal Informaiton - close